K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15
TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.: 303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA
Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual property | The Guardian
Adidas Successful in Three-stripe Opposition Case
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
CURIA - Documents
Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law
Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than Stripes – Infusion Lawyers
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry
adidas Loses Three Stripes Trademark Battle in EU Court | Hypebeast
6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Welcome
